Thursday, April 3, 2008

Why swear at public events?

Last night we went to a hockey game here in Chicago. Now I understand that when someone goes to an event and your team is the "away" team, there will be a certain amount heckling and smart mouthing. That is expected and part of what makes going to a game fun, support for your team and not supporting the other team. But last night, I experienced something that I never really have at any other event. The couple sitting behind us was spewing forth nothing but F bombs all evening. Apparently they had no further mental capacity for human speech than to accentuate every other word with the favored F bomb. Oh, and don't forget that when you sit in the upper most section and are only six or seven rows from the top, the teams down on the ice can actually hear you in an arena filled with over 20,000 people. Yup, hassle the players from up here, it'll work awesome! Good job sparky! Keep up the good work.
I love going to sporting events and seeing the live action, but no where does it say that I need to put up with constant strings of F bombs. But, like the one member of this linguistic duo said last night, "this is a hockey game, not church." I'm still not sure what that was supposed to mean. Apparently these folk only keep themselves from swearing while in the house of the Lord. And if thats the case, I truly feel sorry for all that they encounter on a daily bases. Go into 7/11 for a coffee "thanks for the F...in coffee!", or out of a taxi "thanks for f...in ride", or even mothers day, "here's some f...in flowers, mom." I am seriously upset about this and wish that they would think a little more about how their actions effect those around them. Yes we have freedom of speech, but we also have a choice as to when to express it and when to keep it to yourselves. I would like to be able to go to a sporting event and not feel horribly uncomfortable about the prospect of taking my kids with me some day.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

What the ?

I was just checking the "News" section of Google and came across two separate "top" stories. One is that the Governor of New York is about to resign because he purchased the service of a personal escort/s. The other is a study conducted by the Center for Disease Control which learned that over a quarter of the female teens screened were positive "for at least 1 STD". The second story reported that this could be partly to blame on abstinence only programs and the teens own sense of invulnerability. I want to bang my head against the wall. Honestly. One, because once again we have a New York politician stuck in a sex scandal (does anyone remember that prior to 9/11 Giuliani was caught up in a similar situation?), and two because apparently the teenagers in this study don't value their bodies or purity enough to wait for marriage to a single partner or at least use protection no matter what activity they are partaking in. The study showed that some of the teens believed that they could only get an STD from sexual intercourse. Why? Where are these myths being perpetrated? My head actually hurts because of this. I really wonder where this perception comes from. Oh, but wait, I forgot. Apparently its ok for our political leaders to use escort services. I pray that our next president will have the initiative to realistically evaluate what our country needs.